Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 04:05
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sci-fi action-RPG Hell is Us gets PC demo out today on Steam - Eurogamer
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What would you do if you found out that someone had broken into your home while you were sleeping?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Will friendly dogs protect their owners?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Alex Cora Takes Blame for Red Sox Woes After Extra Innings Loss - Sports Illustrated
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What are some interview experiences with JP Morgan India?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Finally a silent Snapdragon 2-in-1 - Microsoft Surface Pro 12 review - Notebookcheck
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.